Posted on September 30, by Scott Alexander [Content warning: Try to keep this off Reddit and other similar sorts of things.
The thing about this book, and many others of similar vein from the same period, are two basic assumptions: The basic concept was that while government might lease a major chunk of the station, it was the commercial aspects that made it a viable concept.
Nobody was going to foot the bill for government to build its own station. Back then, it never occurred to futurists like Del Rey that spaceflight would become the exclusive domain of governments.
And while there were numerous scifi stories about first Contact and exploration, a lot of the hard, practical Cultivation project presentation essay of the time was about the commercial exploitation of the solar system. Writers of hard speculative fiction, such as Heinlein and Del Rey and Nourse wrote stories centered on the concept of exploitation, mining, farming, manufacturing, terraforming, colonization, expansion, with exploration as a sort of byproduct — these were the themes that tied together the Winston seriesand it was a common theme of Heinlein and Clarke and Asimov and the other greats who were hardly starry eyed dreamers.
That what Vespucci and Drake and all those other explorers were doing. Unfortunately or not, dependinghistory rarely, if ever, repeats itself. For many reasons — much of which involves the paranoia of the Cold War — access to space became almost exclusively the domain of governments, and only a few governments at that.
Because of this, human access to space is far, far beyond the ordinary earthbound human being and is the exclusive purview of a tiny cadre Cultivation project presentation essay highly trained government employees or the very, very rich.
What we have is a space program.
This is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself — depending entirely on what the objective is. The objectives of our space program are many and varied, but none of those objectives will ever lead to the kind of self sustaining commercial ventures visualized in the popular speculation of the Golden Age.
The Shuttle is a perfect example. Government cannot build a spaceship — at least not a very efficient one. The Shuttle as first designed was supposed to make access to space simple and cheap. The Shuttle was supposed to do that for us. Instead we got just exactly the opposite. To them, the Shuttle meant, and still means, jobs and pork and votes.
By the time Congress got done redesigning the Shuttle it was astounding that the damned thing could even clear the pad. Gone were the safety features like air-breathing engines that would have let the ship abort a landing and make a once around on final approach, gone was the piloted reusable main booster, gone was the simplicity that would have gotten rid of much of the previous Apollo infrastructure.
Gone too was the once-a-week turnaround time from recovery to relaunch that would have made efficient use the economies of scales and reduced ground to orbit costs to dollars a pound instead of tens of thousands of dollars per pound.
To this day parts are manufactured all across the country, many as far from the launch and assembly site as it is possible to get and still be on the same continent, because Senators and Representatives from powerful states like California insisted that it be so.
It is the single most expensive engineering project in the history of the human race when you fold in everything necessary to build, maintain, and crew it — and yet, what is its purpose? What does it do?
As a science platform it is a of limited utility and as a node of commercial development it has little or no utility at all. Maintaining the ISS requires a significant fraction of our budget and requires that whatever launch vehicles we build have to be able to reach it and service it.
Where does that leave us? But we are never going to get anywhere like this. At the time Dr. It remains, more than four decades later, an eloquent statement of the value of the space exploration endeavor. Born in Germany inDr.
Stuhlinger received a Ph. Army at Fort Bliss, Texas. Stuhlinger received numerous awards and widespread recognition for his research in propulsion. Dear Sister Mary Jucunda: Your letter was one of many which are reaching me every day, but it has touched me more deeply than all the others because it came so much from the depths of a searching mind and a compassionate heart.
I will try to answer your question as best as I possibly can. First, however, I would like to express my great admiration for you, and for all your many brave sisters, because you are dedicating your lives to the noblest cause of man:Introduction to the Rice Cultivation Project Protocol (RCPP) Special Topic Webinar February 16, 2 Agenda Introductions Brief summary of the Rice Cultivation Project Protocol (RCPP) Overview of Environmental Defense Fund’s California rice pilot projects Q&A.
3 Background - U.S. Rice. The Energy Racket. By Wade Frazier. Revised in June Introduction and Summary. A Brief Prehistory of Energy and Life on Earth.
Early Civilization, Energy and the Zero-Sum Game. I went to the library and found the [September ] article. The quote is a complete fabrication. What the article does say is: The great idea emerges originally in the consciousness of the race as a vague intuition; and this is the form it keeps, rude and imposing, in myth, tradition and poetry.
Managerial accounting is designed to introduce the fundamentals of managerial accounting to both accounting and non-accounting majors. It covers accounting and management decision making in both short-term and long-term strategic situations.
Good Reader, Bad Reader from Boston Review. Bad readers were not born, they were created. To know them is to understand literature and politics in postwar America.
The whole structure of Western society may well be unfitted for the effort that the conquest of space demands. No nation can afford to divert its ablest men into such essentially non-creative, and occasionally parasitic, occupations as law, advertising, and banking.